http://www.spearhead.com/0507-smg.html
In Praise of Medieval England
The Middle Ages are
frequently associated with backwardness, tyranny and poverty: a period in which
life was hard and short. Notwithstanding the absence of technological benefits
in the fields of medicine and science, this was in reality an age in which
prosperity and happiness were abundant and widely diffused.
The litmus test of any
successful civilisation is the financial arrangements which prevail in its
economic life. Are the means of exchange - that is money and credit - issued by
the state for the sole benefit of its inhabitants, or are they controlled and
manipulated by private bankers for their own enrichment and the enslavement of
the people?
In mediaeval England state
finances were firmly in the hands of the king, but prior to 1290 they were in
the grip of a group of marauding moneylenders.
The laws against usury before
the arrival of William the Conqueror in 1066 were very strict. In 899 King
Alfred (871-99) directed that the property of usurers be forfeited, while in
1050 Edward the Confessor (1042-66) decreed not only forfeiture, but that a
usurer be declared an outlaw and banished for life.
These wise laws were
abandoned when the Normans defeated the English at Hastings on October 14th
1066. William I (1066-87) was accompanied by a party of Jewish settlers, who
had been resident in Rouen, Normandy, since Roman times. Circumstantial
evidence indicates that these Jews had provided financial support for William's
military campaign in return for the right to practise usury in England under
royal protection.
It was, however, William's
son Rufus (1087-1100) who actively permitted these Jews to engage in lending
money at interest - a venture in which he initially took a 50 per cent share of
the profits. In order to pay the interest on loans advanced to the Crown, Rufus
was obliged to tax the populace, which engendered much resentment towards him.
The Encyclopaedia Britannica provides a vivid description of this odious man:-
‘In appearance William II was
unattractive; bullnecked, with sloping shoulders, extremely corpulent and
awkward in his gait; His long locks and clean-shaven face marked his
predilection for the newfangled fashions which contemporary ecclesiastics were
never weary of denouncing. His features were strongly marked and coarse, his
eyes grey and deeply set; he owed his nickname (Rufus) to the fiery hue of his
complexion. He stuttered violently and in moments of passion was almost
inarticulate. His familiar conversation was witty and blasphemous. He was
surrounded by a circle of vicious parasites, and no semblance of decorum
was maintained in his household.
‘His character was assailed
by the darkest rumours, which he never attempted to refute. He died unmarried
and without issue.’
Those Jews not involved in
the money-lending racket traded in corn and wool or dealt in trinkets, cheap
jewellery and useless junk. Although it was forbidden by statute, many of them
engaged in coin-clipping, that is filing and clipping the edges of coins and
putting them back into circulation as clipped coins. The filings and clippings
were then melted into bullion. A similar fraud they perpetrated was the plating
of tin with silver and then selling it as silver-plate.
Incensed by alien practice
Another practice which
incensed the English merchants was the custom of Jewish traders of selling a
whole range of merchandise under one roof. Items such as candles, cloth, iron,
leather, silver- ware which were normally sold in separate shops, were all
disposed of in a bazaar type operation. The greed of these traders caused both
anger and impoverishment amongst the merchant class and undermined the guilds.
The moneylenders charged
princes and other noblemen interest rates of at least 33 per cent per annum on
lands which they had mortgaged. The working class, who pledged their tools of
trade or chattels, were expected to pay rates of up to 300 per cent per annum.
Not unexpectedly, within two generations one quarter of all English lands were
in the ownership of Jewish usurers.
The allegations of ritual
murder of pre-adolescent Christian boys around the time of the Jewish Passover,
or Pesach, added greatly to the general clamour that all Jews should be removed
from England.
In 1233 the Statutum de
Judeismo restricted the lending activities of the Jewish money-lenders, and in
1275 a statute abolished all forms of usury. An extract from the latter statute
reads as follows:-
‘Forasmuch as the King hath
seen that divers evils and the disinheriting of good men of his land have
happened by the usuries which the Jews have made in time past, and that divers
sins have followed thereupon that he and his ancestors have received much
benefit from the Jewish people in all times past, nevertheless, for the honour
of God and the common benefit of the people, the King hath ordained and
established that from henceforth no Jew shall lend anything at usury either
upon land or upon other thing (writer's emphasis).
‘And that no usuries shall
run in time coming from the feast of St. Edward last past. Notwithstanding the
covenants before made shall be observed, saving that the usuries shall cease.
But all those who owe debts to Jews upon pledge of moveables shall acquit them
between this and Easter; if not they shall be forfeited. And if any Jew shall
lend at usury contrary to this Ordinance, the King will not lend his aid,
neither by himself or his officers for the recovering of his loan; but will
punish him at his discretion for the offence and will do justice to the
Christian that he may obtain his pledges again.
‘And that the distress for
debts due unto the Jews from henceforth shall not be so grievous, but that the
moiety of lands and chattels of the Christians shall remain for their
maintenance; and that no distress shall be made for a Jewry debt upon the heir
of the debtor named in the Jew's deed, nor upon any other person holding the
land that was the debtor's before that the debt be put in suit and allowed in
court.’
Finally, in 1290 on July 18th
a statute was passed by King Edward I (1272-1307) and the House of Commons
compelling all Jews* to leave England for ever by November 1st of that year.
Any Jews who remained in the kingdom after that date were liable to be
executed.
The announcement of the
expulsion was greeted with great joy and jubilation throughout the land. Unlike
with the modern practice of ethnic cleansing, the Jews after paying a tax of 1/15th
of the value of their moveables and 1/10th of their specie were permitted to
leave with all their goods and chattels.
National finances
With the banishment of the
money-lenders and the abolition of usury, we may observe how the finances of
the English nation were practised at the different levels of society.
For the individual who wished
to buy a house costing, say, £100 he would be required to make a down-payment
of £10 and negotiate a loan of £90 from a bank. He would own 10 per cent of the
house and the bank would own the remaining 90 per cent. Rent would be payable
on the house of which 10 per cent would accrue to himself and the balance of 90
per cent to the bank. The following year he would pay the bank a further
instalment of 10 per cent, reducing the bank's ownership to 80 per cent and the
amount of rent payable to it. These instalments would be continued until he
owned 100 per cent of the property.
In the event of the buyer
defaulting on his rent payments he would be evicted. However, he could never
lose that portion of the house he had paid for and would continue to receive
rent on it. House price inflation was not a factor during this era, as the rate
of inflation was zero - as it should be. In any normal society which does not
practise usury.
A business loan would be
agreed on the following terms:-
A fishing captain of
sufficient years' experience who wished to purchase his own boat would approach
a bank for a loan. He would buy a boat, which would belong to the bank. The
bank would pay him a salary. After one year he would have the option to buy 10
per cent of the boat and receive 10 per cent of the profits. This procedure
would continue until he owned 100 per cent of the boat. If, for example, after
two years the bank decided to cancel the agreement because the captain was
doing a poor job, he would still retain his 20 per cent share. In the event of
the boat sinking, the insurance would cover it. The essence of this contract
was that it was fair to both sides and that risk was equally shared by both
borrower and lender.
The tally stick
The finances of the English
Crown from 1290 onwards were centred around what was known as the `tally
stick`. This ancient instrument of finance, known to the Saracens and possibly
also to the Chinese, is derived from the Latin word tallia, meaning a stick. A
tally stick was made out of hazel, willow or boxwood because these woods split
easily. They were usually eight inches in length (from forefinger to thumb) and
half an inch wide, although they could be up to eight feet long.
The denominations were
indicated by differently sized cuts in the wood. A thousand pounds was marked
by cutting out the thickness of the palm of a hand, one hundred pounds by the
breadth of the little finger, one pound that of a swelling barleycorn,
shillings somewhat less; and pence were marked by incisions. The payee was
recorded on the flat sides.
When all the details had been
recorded on the tally it was split nearly to the bottom, so that one part
retained a stump, or handle, on which a hole would be bored. This was known as
the counter-tally, or counterfoil, and was held on a rod at the Exchequer. The
flat strip (without the stump) was given to the payee. As no two pieces of wood
are identical, it was impossible to forge a tally stick.
Tally sticks were first
introduced during the reign of King Henry I (1100-35) and would remain in
circulation until 1783. It was, however, during the period 1290-1485 that
tallies would reach their apogee and constitute the principal means of state
finance. Tallies were used not only to pay state salaries, but to finance major
items of infrastructure, such as construction of the wall of the City of
London, public buildings and ports.
The exact amount of tallies
in circulation during this period is not known, but as late as 1694 £17 million
worth were still in existence. This was a prodigious sum, as the King's annual
budget rarely exceeded £2.5 million, and a labourer earned only a penny a day.
With very few taxes, no state
debt and no interest to pay, a contented and prosperous life was enjoyed by all
the inhabitants of England. A labourer could provide for all the necessities
his family required. People were well clothed in good woollen cloth and had
plenty of meat and bread.
Houston Stewart Chamberlain,
the German-domiciled British philosopher, confirms these living conditions in The Foundations of the 19th Century:-
‘In the thirteenth century,
when the Teutonic races began to build up their new world, the agriculturist
over nearly the whole of Europe was a freer man, with a more assured existence,
than he is to-day (writer's emphasis): copyhold was the rule, so that
England, for example - today a seat of landlordism - was even in the fifteenth
century almost entirely in the hands of hundreds of thousands of farmers, who
were not only legal owners of their land but possessed, in addition,
far-reaching free rights to common pastures and woodlands.’
The average labourer in those
days worked only 14 weeks a year and, not surprisingly, there were 160 to 180
holidays a year. According to Lord Leverhulme, a writer on that period,
"The men of the 15th century were very well paid." In fact they were
so well paid that it would only be by the late 19th century that a worker's
wages equalled the buying power of those of the mediaeval period.
Visitor observes prosperity
An Italian traveller visiting
England in the reign of King Henry VII (1485-1509) gives a glimpse of the
prosperity he found in London:-
‘...In one single street,
named Strada (Cheapside), leading to St. Paul's, there are fifty-two
goldsmiths' shops, so rich and full of silver vessels, great and small, that in
all the shops in Milan, Rome, Venice and Florence put together I do not think
there would be found so many of the magnificence that are to be seen in
London.’
The large amount of free time
available enabled the English country folk to indulge in fishing, hunting,
hawking and snaring, while studying and reading were popular in the winter months.
This explains why this period has always been known as ‘Merrie England’,
Shakespeare described England as being...
‘This royal throne of kings,
this scepter'd isle, This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars, This other Eden,
demi-Paradise.’
A feature of mediaeval life
in England was the prominent role which religion played. With a population of
only five million, some 100,000 pilgrims would be visiting Canterbury Cathedral
and other shrines at any one time. Piety and meditation formed an integral part
of their devotions.
The nation's wealth could be
seen in the beautiful Gothic cathedrals, which were erected throughout the
land. Many of them were built with the help of voluntary labour. G.M.
Trevelyan, the social historian, writes that...
‘The continuous but
ever-moving tradition of ecclesiastical architecture still proceeded on its
majestic way, filling England with towering forests of masonry of which the
beauty and grandeur have never been rivalled either by the Ancients or the
Moderns. In the newer churches the light no longer crept but flooded in,
through the stained glass, of which the secret is today even more completely
lost than the magic of the architecture.’
Critics might raise the
objection that during this epoch England was involved in the Hundred Years' War
(1337-1453). However, many of these battles were little more than large-scale
archery contests, and none was fought on English soil. The English crossbowman
was the most skilled exponent of this type of warfare. At Agincourt, October 25th
1415, the principal battle of that war, contemporary estimates of English
casualties range from 14 to 1,600.
With the advent in the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries of the goldsmiths, who practised fraudulent
banking based on fractional reserves, this glorious period in European history
slowly came to a close. On June 1 1694 it terminated with the establishment of
the Bank of England and the institution of a National Debt. This private bank
took over the finances of the Crown and is directly responsible for having
reduced the English and other British to their current status of debt slavery.
* The Jewish population at
the time was approximately 16,000
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment